<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Litmus Test: Transitioning Technology to Product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/04/03/a-litmus-test-when-technology-becomes-a-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/04/03/a-litmus-test-when-technology-becomes-a-product/</link>
	<description>influence your space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:15:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Many Angels Can Dance on Top of a Product Manager Pin? &#124; DevelopmentCorporate</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/04/03/a-litmus-test-when-technology-becomes-a-product/comment-page-1/#comment-2371</link>
		<dc:creator>How Many Angels Can Dance on Top of a Product Manager Pin? &#124; DevelopmentCorporate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/?p=277#comment-2371</guid>
		<description>[...] Product Management is different in each organization, with different title lengths and varying levels of P&amp;L influence/accountability.  Some are business owners and others manage requirements - some do all, while the common theme exist &#8220;You have to keep things going right way and manage priorities&#8221;.  PM&#8217;s are responsible for optimizing the cross functional interfaces, customer value and competitiveness of their product in the marketplace and that creates a bunch of Dilbert moments.  PM&#8217;s just dance around the organization and try to make things work.  In the more technical organizations these folks are constantly managing the delivery of IP to Product. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Product Management is different in each organization, with different title lengths and varying levels of P&amp;L influence/accountability.  Some are business owners and others manage requirements &#8211; some do all, while the common theme exist &#8220;You have to keep things going right way and manage priorities&#8221;.  PM&#8217;s are responsible for optimizing the cross functional interfaces, customer value and competitiveness of their product in the marketplace and that creates a bunch of Dilbert moments.  PM&#8217;s just dance around the organization and try to make things work.  In the more technical organizations these folks are constantly managing the delivery of IP to Product. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spatially relevant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BIG Idea - Give me money PLEASE?!?!</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/04/03/a-litmus-test-when-technology-becomes-a-product/comment-page-1/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>spatially relevant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BIG Idea - Give me money PLEASE?!?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/?p=277#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>[...] couple of weeks I&#8217;ve been just crazy busy with work, but I&#8217;ve also been pitched several technology projects to participate in from a labor perspective or to throw a little cash at. After sitting in these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couple of weeks I&#8217;ve been just crazy busy with work, but I&#8217;ve also been pitched several technology projects to participate in from a labor perspective or to throw a little cash at. After sitting in these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/04/03/a-litmus-test-when-technology-becomes-a-product/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/?p=277#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>A technology becomes a product when you have a client paying you to build a custom application on top of the technology, or you&#039;ve built a product on top of the technology. Once you&#039;ve built your product on top of your technology, the product manager has to manage both separately. 

If you have not built a layered architecture and you are selling your technology, it unfortunately is still not a product. Unproductized technology is a hard sale. If you are pushing it at geeks, don&#039;t expect to make revenues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A technology becomes a product when you have a client paying you to build a custom application on top of the technology, or you&#8217;ve built a product on top of the technology. Once you&#8217;ve built your product on top of your technology, the product manager has to manage both separately. </p>
<p>If you have not built a layered architecture and you are selling your technology, it unfortunately is still not a product. Unproductized technology is a hard sale. If you are pushing it at geeks, don&#8217;t expect to make revenues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
